I’m currently testing out Zooomr as a possible alternative to Flickr and I like most of what I see thus far. Except the speed. They seem to be using a shared C=64 hosting service or something of similar slowness. Perhaps they should tend to the servers before trying to bump up the number of users.
At least it isn’t as slow as second life 
Shameless self promotion in order to get a free upgrade to the Zooomr Pro account . . .
Here’s a picture that’s hosted on zooomr :
DSC_0908 Hosted on ZooomrHey, geotagging that isn’t brain-dead and works with Safari browser, unlike Flickr. Cool.
Here’s why I’m looking at zooomr and why it might have been slow yesterday … and a pile of suggestions for what is wrong with it’s ui
trever
January 31st, 2007